Rocky Mountain Gun Owners (RGMO) held its annual free class for teachers on February 28. In 2013, 300 teachers took the class. “They came here for training tonight because they want the next Adam Lanza to face the barrel of a .45,”
Apparently the only government department without a military force at its disposal is the military. So when a lone shooter opens up at an army base, Fort Shock’n'Awe has to call 911 and “shelter in place” until the county sheriff arrives. For your psycho gunman, a military base is basically a grade-school in uniform.
13 yr old suspended in Vernon NJ for Twirling a pencil
Seventh-grader Ethan Chaplin has been home from school for two days after getting in trouble in math class. He says he was just twisting around a pencil with a pen cap on it when a student behind him yelled, “He’s making gun motions, send him to juvie.”
Note that the argument is not whether anybody should give a hoot if the kid made a gun gesture, but rather it seems to be whether or not Chaplin even used the pencil to make a “gun gesture”. He says he was just twirling it, others say he made the diabolical gun-gesture. Nobody, on either side, said “who cares?”
It is now foregone conclusion that a gun gesture, whether it be with a pencil, poptart or simple fingers, is a life-threatening situation that has to be punished.
Now we just argue about the definition of gun gestures. How many fingers does it take to make a gun barrel? One or two? Or does one finger denote smaller calibers like .22 to .25, while two fingers represent 9mm and .45?
Do finger calibers over 0.3 inches in diameter call for more days of suspension?
Does a poptart gun serve as a revolver or a semi-auto? If a student slips a chinese finger trap over one finger does that count as an un-taxed silencer?
This is the utterly stupid predicament faced when leftist screeching alarmism is left unchallenged and not answered with a deafening round of Shut Up!
Given that the average gun-related murder rate over the period in question was 3.44, the results of the present study indicate that states with more restrictive CCW laws had gun-related murder rates that were 10% higher. In addition, the Federal assault weapons ban is significant and positive, indicating that murder rates were 19.3% higher when the Federal ban was in effect.
States that have restrictive “may issue” or “no issue” concealed carry laws between 1980-2009 had a 10% higher gun murder rate than those states that required no permit at all, or who had “shall issue” permitting.
Restrictive concealed carry laws appear to lead to more deaths.
This study went unnoticed by leftist anti-gun bigots. Some kid made a gesture with just the middle finger and they all went into huddle to figure out what kind of gun was being used – consensus is leaning towards mortar.
It’s one of those bizarre stories that drops the jaws of those of us jaded by years of observing the hypocrisy, the double standards, and the in-your-face breaking of rules that seemingly defines the elites of the gun-ban crowd.
Like most cowardly mass shooters, the MOMENT someone armed stood up against him he shot himself. Unfortunately the unnamed female MP officer didn’t arrive until after Lopez racked up 19 causalities.
Rep. Steve Stockman (R) of Texas summed it up best when he introduced legislation that would allow both service members and federal civilians to carry their personal weapons on military installations after the Navy Yard shooting:
“Our disarmed military bases are vulnerable targets for terrorists, as we saw in Fort Hood and the Navy Yard. Despite that, soldiers trained to use guns cannot carry on base. The result is two mass killings where defenseless soldiers had to watch as their friends were murdered.”
Stockman will continue to be proven a sage until the members of the US Military are no longer disarmed and left like lambs to the slaughter at the hands of madmen.
How many more soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen have to die because of gun control?
NBC News in Washington listed shootings at U.S. military bases since 1994 in the wake of the most recent attack on Fort Hood, but did not delve into any that may have happened before 1993.
The article failed to make the obvious connection that before 1993, mass shootings on United States military bases did not exist.
It is unconscionable that soldiers who are tasked with keeping Americans safe are thwarted by politicians from keeping themselves safe.
Example in four parts:
Part 1 assholes tolerated
Part 2 (0:30) Tolerance begins to deteriorate
Part 3 (0:44) Tolerance disappears
Part 4 (1:14 forward) Tolerance gone, so are assholes
See how that works?
Remember that the people they are seeking out for destruction gave money years ago to a proposition that was passed by a majority of California voters, who were then overruled by the courts, starting with gay activist judge Vaughn Walker. Prop 8 is long dead; the liberals who control the judiciary have spoken. The explicit objective now is to hunt down people who have privately held views in the past that are currently considered inconsistent with leftwing ideology.
This isn’t about promoting homosexuality as an end in itself, or only the tiny percentage of Americans who are pushily homosexual would be driving it. This is a major battle in the Cultural Marxist war to replace America with a country where no thought crime (as defined by ultra-Left oligarchs) will be tolerated.
IRS agents testified before Congress that the agency’s political targeting did not apply to progressive groups as Democrats and the media have claimed …
… No evidence exists that the IRS requested additional information from any Occupy Wall Street group.
“[T]he Administration and congressional Democrats have seized upon the notion that the IRS’s targeting was not just limited to conservative applicants,” the report states. “These Democratic claims are flat-out wrong and have no basis in any thorough examination of the facts. Yet, the Administration’s chief defenders continue to make these assertions in a concerted effort to deflect and distract from the truth about the IRS’s targeting of tax-exempt applicants.”
“[T]here is simply no evidence that any liberal or progressive group received enhanced scrutiny because its application reflected the organization’s political views,” the report stated.
» President Barack Obama’s Complete List of Historic Firsts
» Charlie Rangel, Corrupt Deadbeat, Is Bailed Out by Taxpayers
» Hillary Clinton’s Approval Drops by More Than 14%
» DEADLY EXPERIMENTS ON HUMANS: The Mengele EPA
America does have a gaping infrastructure crisis, but fixing this problem wouldn’t cost a penny of taxpayer dollars, never mind hundreds of billions of dollars added to the debt, so the White House probably won’t be interested.
if you visit the drilling sites in Williston, N.D., you discover an amazing phenomenon: At night, this little energy town of fewer than 30,000 people lights up like Manhattan on New Year’s Eve. All these lights are flares burning off the natural gas that was drilled that day. Why on earth would the drillers do that? Because they want oil, which sells at $100 a barrel, as opposed to natural gas, which is now so abundant that it’s cheap.
But why don’t they sell the natural gas too? Because they don’t have the pipeline capacity to bring it to the markets where it’s needed. So they are burning off an energy source, without capturing the power. What a waste.
The pipelines aren’t getting built, simply because the government isn’t letting them get built. It has been an eye-opening experience to watch liberals block an infrastructure project — the Keystone XL pipeline
… the peer-reviewed article “provides a rationale” for passing off politically motivated lies as science.
The reasoning is circular, since the rationale for lying is the same lie that they are trying to rationalize: that “climate change” is harmful, caused by people, and subject to bureaucratic control.
But the important thing to unscrupulous “researchers” is to keep that grant money flowing from bureaucrats who will never give up on global warming no matter how cold winters get, so long as it can be used to dupe idiots into surrendering their money and freedom.
What riles me up is that the 2016 ballot may feature a meaningless choice between two quislings devoted to our country’s annihilation.
If the RINO establishmentarians who gave us McCain manage to get this pernicious bleeding heart liberal tool on the ticket, the Republican Party is over.
If the GOP can’t figure out how to train a jellyfish to stand erect and dress it in coat and tie, then ole Jeb will do in a pinch.
As far as I’m concerned the Republican Party is already over.