March 1, 2012
» NATO Agrees To Let Afghan Government Try Koran-Burning Soldiers
NATO officials promised to meet Afghan nation’s demand of bringing to justice, through an open trial, those responsible for the incident and it was agreed that the perpetrators of the crime be brought to justice as soon as possible …
Obama, the entire world is watching, waiting to see what you are going to do. While you’re rummaging around in the closet looking for your balls, bear in mind: if you get this one wrong, you’ll wish you were in the Kenyan mudhut with your brother.
Clare Lopez, a senior fellow with the Center for Security Policy, said if the statement by the Afghan government turns out to be true, it would be an unprecedented betrayal of our men and women in uniform.
“I can’t imagine we would ever do this, what would we charge them with? Are we going to try Americans for crimes committed under Shariah law? I cannot believe our government would go that far,”
whether the soldiers end up being turned over to the Afghan government or face court-martial, either decision would set a dangerous precedent.
“It would be unconscionable either way,” he said. “If they turn them over to the Afghan government for trial then we are endorsing the applicability of Shariah law to non-Muslims in the U.S. military. If they court-martial them then they are adopting those norms as part of the UCMJ. Either way it’s frightening.”
If this is true, the lousy son of a bitch who resides in our White House, has a LOT of explaining to do. HOW DARE HE!
US soldiers could be handed over to an Afghan sharia court for burninig copies of the Koran at a US military base. I say could be because Afghanistan claims that they will be, and the Pentagon and White House are silent on the matter.
Say what you will about energy companies but their business plan generally involves getting a product to market. The energy plan on the government side is to make energy more expensive and keep as much of it off the market as possible. The costs of their policies are not just a talking point, they are a grim reality.
The family that has to choose between feeding their children or being able to afford to drive to work or heat their home is not a talking point, they are the new Kulaks, the victims of ideological government policy that has no problem with watching people die so long as it gets its way.
Stalin killed millions to industrialize the Soviet Union, the New Left will kill millions to deindustrialize the West.
Americans complaining about high gas and oil prices can buckle up because what is happening in Europe is only a taste of what is coming this way. Last year UK petrol prices hit 6 pounds per gallon. That’s nearly 10 dollars, though for the imperial gallon which is higher than the US gallon. If you think it costs a lot to fill up a tank now, consider that the UK has a better ratio of production to population n than we do. The high prices aren’t an accident, they’re part of the green program.
The Obama agenda isn’t to make energy prices affordable, it’s to make them so horribly impossible to afford that we’ll use less energy. Fuel poverty is the agenda here and we know that’s so because he told us so.
…. there is a simple three-step solution:
1. Vote anyone likely to collaborate with UN despots out of office.
2. Withdraw from the UN.
3. Bulldoze that hideous domino looming over Turtle Bay into the East River, preferably with the dictatorial moonbat bureauweenies still inside.
And then there’s the one-step solution. It’s simple but very unpleasant.
In 1963, when the vilest of structural systems denied blacks the right to vote in the South, groups like the NAACP devoted enormous resources to enfranchise the disenfranchised.
Fast forward to 2012.
How much effort is the NAACP devoting to getting people these free photo IDs? How many dollars, or even pennies, is the NAACP expending to give people free rides to get their free IDs? How active is the NAACP in overcoming the “new” Jim Crow as they were the old, real, Jim Crow?
The ‘C’ no longer stands for ‘Colored’. It’s another C-word now, it ends with ‘ist’ and has a ‘ommun’ in the middle.
You mean stealing more money from businesses — to fund a bloated, unaccountable public sector — leaves companies with less money to hire workers?
Gee, that logic is sooo difficult to comprehend. That is, if you’re a Democrat or an idiot. But I repeat myself.
Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown law student and “reproductive rights activist” who supports Obama’s contraception mandate, told the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee on Monday that the edict against religious institutions must stand because women at her school have to purchase so much birth control.
Apparently, coeds at her school are so sexually active they are going broke.
Stop the Tape!
I have questions. One, what does it take to get the opportunity to speak to the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee? Obviously not much. Where do I sign up? I have hours of stuff to say to them. And I guarantee I’ll make more sense than this silly little sniveling shrew. But that’s not saying much, is it? I could stand up on the table and fart at them and make more sense.
That’s not a joke, look at some of the stuff she said:
Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result ….
Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school ….
For a lot of students, like me, who are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary ….
The author points out that to use $3000 dollars worth of condoms during a 3 year college party would require “having sex 2.74 times a day, every day, for three straight years“, and then quotes Rush Limbaugh:
What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps. (interruption) The johns? We would be the johns? No! We’re not the johns. (interruption) Yeah, that’s right. Pimp’s not the right word. Okay, so she’s not a slut. She’s “round heeled.” I take it back.
So then the round-heel says to the pointy-heads,
We refuse to pick between a quality education and our health and we resent that, in the 21st Century, anyone thinks it’s acceptable to ask us to make that choice simply because we are women
Fluke is typical liberal-leftist. She expects – no, demands – that the rest of us foot the bill for her non stop screw-fest.
Freebies! Gimme! Gimme!
Tell ya what Fluke, I’ll foot the bill for a year’s worth of these:
If you’ll lock yourself in your smelly bedroom and just shut up.
» If You Use Georgia Pacific Paper Products, Barack Obama Wants You To Turn Yourself In
» SAF CONDEMNS TEXAS LAW PROF’S CLAIM THAT OH SCHOOL SHOOTING IS ‘EXERCISE OF 2A’
» Three Wash. Senators ‘dancing in blood’ to push anti-gun agenda?
Paul’s appeal to the Muslim community is strictly and completely based on his opposition to Israel. Paul’s anti-Semitism is well-documented ….
His CYA maneuver, stating that he wants to cut all foreign aid, then determine to whom American should restore aid, is just that – a CYA maneuver. His real target is and always was Israel.
~~ via iOwnTheWorld
March 1st, 2012 under Uncategorized.