Home

» Local Winooski, Vermont restaurant Sneakers Bistro has removed a sign that read, “Yield Sneakers Bacon” citing opposition from a Muslim community member and safety concerns.

… was removed after a woman, identifying herself as a Muslim, posted in an online community forum, stating she was personally offended by the sign, according to a WPTZ News report. WPTZ wrote that the woman who complained online called the sign “insensitive to those who do not consume pork.”

I interrupt this excerpt for the following public service announcement:
Muslims are offended. Period. By anything and everything – including themselves. A unoffended muslim is as rare as sightings of chickens with dentures driving stolen tractors – wearing sombreros.
Almost as rare is the non-muslim American that has the nads to tell the offended muzzie to stuff a ham bone in it.

“We are here to serve people BREAKFAST, not politics. We removed the sign that was located on public property as a gesture of respect for our diverse community. There were also concerns raised about safety(emphasis added). Removing it was not a difficult decision. We still love bacon. We still love eggs. Please have the political conversation elsewhere.”

Oh well, I see I was wrong. That was a mighty in-your-face in-your-burka-hole statement right there. Yea buddy, yaw have your argument somewhere else, we’ll eat our bacon and eggs behind our own walls, and you just leave us alone.

Problem is, you tolerated the bully. The bully will be back, most likely demanding that you stop serving pork altogether – to avoid offending her again. You shoulda nipped it in the bud, with the aforementioned “stuff a ham bone in it … bitch”.

» Australia: The heat is on. Bureau of Meteorology ‘altering climate figures’

How accurate are our national climate datasets when some adjustments turn entire long stable records from cooling trends to warming ones (or visa versa)? Do the headlines of “hottest ever record” (reported to a tenth of a degree) mean much if thermometer data sometimes needs to be dramatically changed 60 years after being recorded?

» The Latest Crazy Excuse From The Warming Enthusiasts—Global Warming Causes Global Cooling
From the comments:

So are we having an ice age or not? I just need to know how to dress.

» The EU says you have to live with a dirtier house to make the EU feel better about global warming.

» EPA ban on wood stoves is freezing out rural America

But the larger problem is the Sue and Settle sweetheart lawsuits through which Greens dictate policy.
…
Older stoves that don’t cannot be traded in for updated types, but instead must be rendered inoperable, destroyed, or recycled as scrap metal.

…
“Sue and Settle “ practices, sometimes referred to as “friendly lawsuits,” are cozy deals through which far-left radical environmental groups file lawsuits against federal agencies wherein court-ordered “consent decrees” are issued based upon a prearranged settlement agreement they collaboratively craft together in advance behind closed doors. Then, rather than allowing the entire process to play out, the agency being sued settles the lawsuit by agreeing to move forward with the requested action both they and the litigants want.
…
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has concluded that Sue and Settle rulemaking is responsible for many of EPA’s “most controversial, economically significant regulations that have plagued the business community for the past few years.” Included are regulations on power plants, refineries, mining operations, cement plants, chemical manufacturers, and a host of other industries. Such consent decree-based rulemaking enables EPA to argue to Congress: “The court made us do it.”

» Newest scam: donate money to help alleviate the fears of ‘scared scientists’

World’s largest solar energy plant wants to increase its greenhouse gas emissions to 94,749 tons per year
I know what you’re thinking: Increase? The world’s largest green energy plant uses fossil fuels – natural gas. Not only is green energy not green, but can’t produce diddly-squat without using the fossil fuels it is touted to spectacularly replace. That’s not what we should expect from the “World’s largest solar energy plant” that obviously must be the World’s most expensive solar energy plant. Knowing that our money was used to finance it – and our childrens’ money, our grand-childrens’ money – we should be able to assume that it actually works the way (THHO)Obama says it will when he takes our money and doles it out to these shyster green energy companies.
When the lefist greenies tell us about the great new green technologies (as they slip our wallets from our pocket) do they ever say something like “This new technology eliminates fossil fuel use by using fossil fuels” ? Oh no, but when we are robbed by the IRS (which hates our guts) and our money is used to build massive (4,000-acre) green energy facilities, we typically assume (but should insist) that those facilities use none of the fossil fuels they are supposed to replace. That’s not too much to ask – for $2.2 billion.

… has recently filed an application with the State of California to increase the carbon pollution emissions it generates from dirty fossil fuels to 94,749 tons of greenhouse gases per year, a 59% increase above the greenhouse emissions currently permitted by California.

If the petition is approved, the “solar” plant would be allowed to use a quantity of natural gas that would have been enough to supply about 35,000 typical California households. That’s 35% of the 100,000 households the entire project is expected to power – generated from fossil fuels!

This is the same facility that has been making headlines (not MSM headlines, don’t be stoopid) for frying birds in mid-flight. Makes me wonder how much carbon is released by a spontaneously combusting bird.

So this was probably the first time I truly got a taste of how bad it’s gotten, how far society has slipped, how poisoned the populace has become with entitlements. Some people, out of the goodness of their hearts, tried to do something nice for some people who didn’t appreciate it in the least. Things are rapidly getting worse, but I’m ready.

The president has got to come forward with a cohesive, comprehensive strategy, not only in Iraq, but also in Ukraine, also in other parts of the world. This is an administration, which the kindest word I can use, is feckless — where they have not outlined a role that the United States of America has to play and that’s a leadership role.

No more leading from behind. No more don’t do stupid stuff. No more tell Vladimir that I’m going to be more flexible if I am — when I’m re-elected. The president has to understand that America must lead and when America hasn’t, a lot of bad things happen. This is not like the earthquake in San Francisco — all of this could have been avoided, like leaving a residual force behind in Iraq. And obviously the challenge is now much greater than it would have been when the president made the decision not to leave a residual force in Iraq, among other things.

Well, ain’t that the truth?
But what is remarkable is that all that was said by John McCain – who couldn’t tell you what a feck is, what feck looks like or smells like. Because …

Speaking of fecklessness.

» WHO FUNDED THE HAMAS TERROR TUNNELS? Eh, That Would be Hillary Clinton

There’s a reason that the greatest Secretary of State ever is trying to distance herself from Barack Obama. She’s hoping no one remembers that she led the freaking State Department from 2009 to 2013.

Hillary Clinton is a No-Feck-Zone. She sprays herself with feck repellent. No self-respecting feck would ever share a square mile with her.

Watching these guys, though, with the backdrop of Ferguson in my mind quickly killed my laughter, though, and simply depressed me.