January 31, 2014

January 31, 2014
Rep. Larry Pittman targeted by RINOs who would sell you out…

Representative Larry Pittman (R, Cabarrus, GRNC ****) was critical to passing the largest expansion of gun rights in North Carolina history, House Bill 937.

It takes guts to stand up to leadership in defense of gun rights, but there is a price: So called “mainstream” Republicans are determined to remove Pittman. Now the most pro-gun member of the NC House is facing a well-financed RINO in the primary. What will you do about it?

» Upstate NY Counties Demand Their Seal Be Removed from SAFE Act Paperwork

Governor Andrew Cuomo’s SAFE Act continues to anger gun owners in the state of New York. The legislation , which banned the sale of AR-15 semiautomatic rifles, among other restrictions, has resulted in almost 1,200 felonies. Now, it seems legislators are taking their discontent with the law a step further

» The War on Gun Ownership

The War on Gun Ownership isn’t a story about guns; it’s a story about people who own guns, and how their lives and reputations can effectively be ruined by healthcare providers and states rushing to short circuit the very laws and processes that exist to restrain their actions so that a result can be arrived at. That result is the disarmament of individual citizens, many of whom may struggle with a medication adjustment, but who are not demonstrably a threat to themselves or others. Before we as a country commit to blanket solutions for the issue of gun violence, we would do well to consider the story of Lynette Phillips as a cautionary note.


The institutional and activist left is on the march against gun ownership across the United States, and some of their key battlegrounds are coming to the forefront. In California, State Attorney General Kamala Harris has seized some 2,000 weapons in the past year, many from the mentally ill and convicted felons. While this may seem entirely unobjectionable, Harris and her allies are not merely seizing guns from the mentally ill; they are going even further by seizing the registered firearms of anyone who lives with a mentally ill person.

» Negroes and the Gun: A Winchester “in every Black home”

» Mexico Finally Allowing Armed Citizens to Legally Fight Back Against Drug Cartels

As a result of continued drug violence in their communities, Mexican citizens have been arming themselves to fight back against ruthless cartels and breaking the law to do so. In Mexico, regular citizens are not allowed to own firearms.

When citizen, vigilante groups first started arming themselves against the will of the government, police and officials expressed concern and asked the groups to disarm. But now, after armed communities have proven to be an effective force to keep drug cartel activity at bay, the government is changing its tune in some areas of the country.

» You Won’t Believe What’s in the $1 Trillion Farm Bill Disaster

The farm bill is really the “food stamp bill.” About 80 percent of the farm bill spending is devoted to food stamps

This problematic policy, put in place in 2000 and pushed heavily by the Obama administration, allows food stamp recipients to enroll in the program even if they have $1 million in the bank. Food stamp recipients could have an unlimited amount of assets, but if their income is low enough, they could still receive food stamps.

Requires the Christmas Tree Tax.

as this 949-page bill is examined, there will certainly be more bad news. Unfortunately, the House is set to vote on this massive bill less than 48 hours after the text was made available. Apparently, we won’t know what’s in the farm bill until after we pass it and the public is harmed by its policies.

One of the first victims of (THHO)Obama’s vindictive retribution gives the finger.

» Gibson Commemorates Obama’s Raid with Government Series Guitars

On August 24, 2011, armed FBI agents in SWAT gear executed a warrant for the seizure of wood at Gibson Guitar facilities.

one of Gibson’s biggest competitors, C.F. Martin & Co., reportedly uses the same type of wood seized from Gibson’s, but did not face any kind of interference from the federal government. The Examiner reports that Chris Martin IV, CEO of C.F. Martin & Co., is a well-known Democratic fundraiser. The Examiner describes Martin as “a long-time Democratic supporter, with $35,400 in contributions to Democratic candidates and the DNC over the past couple of election cycles.” Furthermore, no other companies known to use the wood in question, such as furniture manufacturers, have reported similar prosecution from the federal government, though the wood is distributed widely throughout the world.




A distinctive vintage-gloss Government Tan finish, complemented by black-chrome hardware and black plastics and trim, is topped by a pickguard that’s hot-stamped in gold with the Government Series graphic—a bald eagle hoisting a Gibson guitar neck. Each Government Series II Les Paul also includes a genuine piece of Gibson USA history in its solid rosewood fingerboard, which is made from wood returned to Gibson by the US government after the resolution.

This week Gibson has announced the “Government Series” of guitars, to celebrate the end of its tussle with the eager enforcers of the U.S. Customs Department.

It’s a series of guitars made, purportedly, with the very same wood that was seized by the United States government, which was later returned at the end of the fiasco.

The body is painted in a custom color the company has named “Government Tan”–suitably drab–a nod to the joyless reality of living under the heavy thumb of stifling bureaucracy.

I’m hoping for a Series III, in yellow and black with a Gadsden graphic.

From the comments:

Where were all of those rich “fight the system” rockers when Gibson was being persecuted? I don’t recall any standing up and condemning the Obama thugs for coming down on a company that helped them become fabulously wealthy.

I think that Gibson should produce a new guitar made out of norwegian spruce and make the fretboard out of ebony. That way, the Libtards can have a limp-wristed bitch-fest over whether Gibson are racist or not because they used more White wood than they did Black wood and they can also complain that the Black wood is being manipulated (fingered) by the White supremacists who try to play the guitar.
Maybe the Libtards could also sue Gibson for using the derogatory term ‘Les Paul’ which is obviously referring to butch Lesbians called Pauline who wish to be simply known by the more masculine name, ‘Paul’.
I mean, to a Leftard anyone or anything can be offensive, so why blame them if they try to milk every opportunity that they can?
Ooh.. sorry, did I say milk? That’s obviously a sexist term that suggests that nipples are only feminine constraints that don’t apply, when it’s obvious that men clearly have nipples too.

» Dershowitz, Law Enforcement Experts Slam D’Souza Targeting

The Justice Department’s tactics remind Dershowitz of the words of Stalin’s secret police chief, Lavrentiy Beria, who said, “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime.”

“This is an outrageous prosecution and is certainly a misuse of resources,” charged Dershowitz. “It raises the question of why he is being selected for prosecution among the many, many people who commit similar crimes.

“This sounds to me like it is coming from higher places. It is hard for me to believe this did not come out of Washington or at least get the approval of those in Washington.”

“In light of recent events and the way the IRS has been used to stifle dissent, this arrest should send shivers down the spines of all freedom-loving Americans

» All the President’s Women

Few men can, with a straight face, expect to get away with yelling back to questions in Congress, “What difference does it make?” Only a liberal woman with an entitlement mentality can get away with something like that without becoming the laughing stock of Saturday Night Live. Nothing works better to manipulate public opinion more than an offended woman questioned by a nasty, bigoted Republican male.

No man could have gotten away without scrutiny for a statement like: “We have to pass the [health care] bill so that you can find out what’s in it.” Only in the current liberal environment can the media make a self-made woman like Sarah Palin the subject of ridicule material, while taking someone like Pelosi seriously.

The mainstream media and academia have produced generations of American women with a constant chip on their shoulder, with unrealistic expectations who perceive life’s challenges as a personal attack because they are women. Ironically, these are the same women who ignore Islamic scandals of honor killing, female genital mutilation and killing of apostates. Some of them even go as far as accusing critics of Islam of being “Islamophobes.”

Under the guise of “we are pro-women” the Left is using women as tools to silence criticism and inquiry of scandals. While the mainstream media places liberal women on a pedestal, it hammers, ridicules and uses vile insults on air to describe conservative women.

And we let them get away with it.

» An American Tragedy

Blackwater wasn’t there to save Stephens – or anyone – because Blackwater had already been destroyed. Its enemies in Afghanistan and Iran could not take it down with all the firepower at their disposal, but its enemies on the home front ended up annihilating it with a tsunami of bad press. Why did they hate it so much? Part of the answer is that Blackwater provided the ideal target for politicians and others on the left who despised the war but who knew that they couldn’t get away with criticizing American troops. Blackwater’s men were Americans, and they were putting their lives on the line in a war zone, but because they weren’t members of the uniformed military, they could freely be derided as mercenaries, soldiers of fortune, murderers for hire. Disgracefully, many higher-ups in the Departments of Defense and State, who knew very well that Blackwater was doing nothing other than following their own orders and keeping them safe, and who should’ve therefore been quick to defend the firm from unfair charges, found it convenient to let the company serve as a lightning rod, taking all the flak that otherwise might be directed at them. Prince, for his part, was obliged to sit silently by while politicians and the media spread lies, because confidentiality agreements barred him from revealing information that would have proven their accusations false.

brought down by cynical and dishonorable politicians, journalists, government officials, and military bureaucrats who were not fit to polish most Blackwater contractors’ boots

» MSNBC APOLOGIZES FOR SMEARING CONSERVATIVES AS RACISTS

Leave it to MSNBC to turn this into a vicious and hateful attack on the “rightwing.” That’s what they do. It’s almost all they do, aside from Rachel Maddow’s occasional fabrication of Koch Brothers conspiracy theories. MSNBC is a fever swamp of hatred; it would be portrayed in the rest of the media as a national crisis, a national embarrassment, if it wasn’t left-wing. It’s a matter of editorial policy – presumably unwritten, because writing it down is unnecessary – for the network to denounce all opposition to Barack Obama as racist in nature. It’s the network that told its viewers words like “golf,” “Chicago,” and “IRS” are part of a secret code used by bigots.


Perpetual assumptions of racist intent are themselves an act of bigotry. Sometimes liberals express this bigotry toward white people in general (with the exception of their own exalted selves, of course.) Sometimes they use it as a crude partisan weapon. Some of the people who say all opposition to Obama is racist are old enough to have been veterans of the battle to destroy Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. They’ll instantly stop equating dissent from a black president with racism the instant a Republican black president is elected. Some of them will look honestly puzzled when accused of hypocrisy on that day, because they’re totalitarians, not hypocrites. Adherence to the correct political dogma is what matters, not what people actually say and do.

» Borderline retard Joe Biden decides to yuck it up while his boss delivers the SOTU.
» Excellence Sacrificed to Diversity at Brooklyn School
» CBS’s Mellody Hobson Coughs Up a Clot of Hypocrisy
» Yet Another Anti-Fracking Study Bumps Into Reality

 

» SCHUMER AND BUDDIES, We Ain’t Gonna Take It: Why the Tea Party Won’t Succumb to IRS Illegal Harassment

Politicians loved the Occupy movement because it moved focus off of them and on to Wall Street. Anything to get the focus off of government. The Tea Party threatens the job security of politicians and government entities. It does NOT threaten regular Americans. Schumer’s very comments tell you why the Tea Party is right on target.

He wants to use the IRS to target them. That’s exactly what the Tea Party is getting at, that the government should never be big enough or strong enough to punish Americans for their politics! Schumer goes on to tell us that his goal is to weaken the party. If you think someone has no impact on your life, you don’t give them the time of day. Schumer and buddies are VERY threatened by the Tea Party, which tells you that the party has struck a nerve and is getting too close for comfort.

» Legal Fight Against No Knock Swat Warrants Explodes Into Open

An important case now presents the significant legal issue of whether police are justified in using no-knock home invasions simply because they know the occupants own a firearm. On January 27, 2014, our firm filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Quinn v. Texas, in support of the grant of a petition for certiorari…

John Quinn was asleep in his bed when Texas police broke down his door in the middle of the night, and shot him when he reached for a weapon, thinking his home was being invaded. The police were there to serve a search warrant for his son, Brian, who they suspected of dealing drugs.
The only justification for the no-knock raid that police gave was that John Quinn owned a firearm.

» DEAR ABBY: I’m in an Abusive Relationship with the Republican Party

Dear Republican Establishment:

So, what do you need to do to get us to stick with you and get us back into your good graces?
Good question [{I’m glad I asked it}]

you can either drop the insane idea of amnesty for the illegal invaders or you can destroy the party – It’s your choice.

Stop insanely nominating Rinocrats in the futile hope that the media will be ‘nice’ to you and not put the full weight of their propaganda machine to work shredding said candidate.

Stop trying to outbid the socialists with government largess – you cannot win the game, because they don’t care if they bankrupt the country in 5 years instead of 20.

» Krtistallnacht perps angry that you noticed

… make no mistake, it’s the Left’s beloved dictators who’ve been responsible for massacring dissidents in job lots, from Stalin to Mao to Hitler to Guevara to Pol Pot to a dozen more you could easily name; the far right’s body count in toto doesn’t begin to approach even one of their more industrious dictators, and the Left’s sum total is nothing short of staggering. I’d suggest FreeFor (Historian’s apt term) dispense with the entire notion of an awareness of history being somehow “paranoid.” It ain’t paranoia if they’re really out to kill you…and they are.

What we really need is a word for those whistlers past the mass graves who are in denial about the odds against yet another repeat performance–the “it couldn’t happen here” or the “it could never happen in the modern era” types. One other than “morons,” I mean. After all, that was the idea carefully maintained, against all the evidence to the contrary, by all too many European and German Jews, right up until they were loaded onto the trains and shoved into the ovens.

What was that old saying about those who refuse to learn from history again, now? Myself, I’d amend it: those who refuse to look Leftist jackals squarely in the eye and recognize them for what they truly are and always have been are doomed to be devoured by them.

» What bias? CNN doesn’t appear to understand the meaning of “fact check”




Yes, the above screen capture is an actual graphic from the news Obama cheerleading organization CNN. The only options for Obama’s statements are “True” and “Mostly True.” This is kind of like asking, “Is Obama A) amazing or B) just kind of great?”

Sorry, CNN, that’s not how fact checking works.




~~ via Allen West, via MoonBattery

Comments are closed.